Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Blogs That Earning Alot



Daily we come across many famous blogs. first we see whats a Blog mean?. A blog is a type of website or part of a website supposed to be updated with new content from time to time. Blogs are usually maintained by an individual with regular entries of commentary, descriptions of events, or other material such as graphics or video. Entries are commonly displayed in reverse-chronological order. Here lets see the top 10 earning blogs of 2011.


10. JoyStiq

AOL is the owner of JoyStiq.
Alexa Rank :- appro 2000 (recently dropped from 1000)
Approximate Blog Worth : $1.28 million
Daily secures : 1700$
Major income is through : CPM Advertisement (Cost per mille) that is when advertisers pay for the exposure they get for each 1000 impressions.

09. Perez Hilton
Mario lavandeira founded Perez Hilton.
Alexa Rank : 978
Daily income : 3500$
Approximate Blog Worth : $2.66 million
Major income is through : Advertisement banners that sells in big figures.

08.Gizmodo
Gizmodo, the gadget guide, as it says, is a poplar technology blog that has a pretty high Technorati authority.
Alexa Rank : 590
Approximate Blog Worth : $2.86 million
Daily income : 4000$

07.Life Hacker
Nick Denton founded Life Hacker. The top notch blog provides daily tips to get things done.
Approximate Blog Worth : $3.52 million
Daily income : 5000$
Main income is through : Advertisement through banners is the main source of income of Life Hacker.

06.Tuts +
Tollis Taeed has build up the blog that holds 722 quality tutorials with more than thousand tutorial source files.
Alexa Rank : 623
Daily income : 5000$
Approximate Blog Value : $3.7 million

05.Smashing Magazine
Smashing magazine is an online magazine for professional web developers. You get thousands of techniques to approach a specific task.
Alexa Rank : 578
Daily income : 6382$ approx
Approximate Blog Worth : $4.66 million

04. Engadget
Engadget is one of the most popular Technology blog. You could read the blog for all day long and wont get bored.
Alexa Rank : 343
Daily income : 10,000$
Approximate Blog Worth : $7.2 million

03. Techcrunch
Techcrunch is THE top technology blog and is considered as the guru blog. There is a huge staff behind the blog success with many writers. Frequently post 20-30 articles daily, Techcrunch has set a reputable space in the modern tech world.

Alexa Rank : 215
Daily income : 14,816$
Approximate Blog Worth : $10.82 million

02. Mashable
A blog that every body has heard of. You might be waiting for it in the list. Mashable, as the name suggest is the mash up of almost every thing online. Its the ultimate blog to follow. The posts are quoted world wide due to the authority that the blog has created over the years.

Mashable is owned by Pete Cashmore.
Daily income : 15781$
Approximate Blog Worth : $11.52 million

01.The Huffington Post
Last but first..The Huffington Post. Arianna Huffington developed the most profitable blog over the years.
Daily income : 30000$
Main income is through : PPC (pay per click) with dominantly Adsense
Approximate Blog Worth : 21.82 million $



Follow @ Twitter  Like Facebook

Labels: ,

Friday, July 16, 2010

Blogs vs Twitter? It’s the Interactivity

In a  post that appeared remarkably soon after my last post in which I noted that I am easier to find on Twitter than on Online Fandom these days, Rob Walker of Murketing and Buying In fame, expressed “Nostalgia for Blogs” and lamented:
I checked the Twitter feed and it was, of course, far less substantial than the blog had been. In fact I didn’t seen a single tweet of interest, whereas this person’s earlier blog posts had been, with some regularity, worth a look. If I don’t “follow” this person, I miss the possibility of some future interesting tweet — at least a link I would have missed, something.On the other hand, if I do follow, I clearly have to wade through a bunch of garbage. The signal-to-noise ratio will clearly be way worse than it had been on the now-dying blog. I’m interested in this person’s thinking — but I’m not that interested.
I wouldn’t want to presume he’s talking about me*, but either way, I’ve got some thoughts.
I agree with him that blogs are (sometimes) more substantial and I think reports of the death of blogs due to Twitter and Facebook are wrong. For me blogging has been a great way to collect and share thoughts on a particular issue, to collect ideas for future longer projects, and to create a public persona as an expert with something to say about the topics I know a lot about. I like to think the blog has been useful to people I wouldn’t otherwise get to communicate with. I’ve come into contact with many people, especially those on the ground addressing the issues I write about here, through this blog. Blogging has been and I hope it will continue to be great. It also takes a lot of time to get a post to what I want it to be before I post it.
But that said, I think Walker’s characterization misses the point on a few scores.
1) Twitter isn’t a substitute for blogging. Some people may choose to Twitter instead of blogging, but I wouldn’t assume that anyone has that kind of either/or relationship. A tweet is not meant to accomplish what a blog post is meant to accomplish. Neither’s killing the other, they aren’t in competition anymore than, oh, say writing books vs. writing a blog.
2) People like Twitterers’ minutia. In my case, though we’re not talking big numbers either way, more people follow me on Twitter than subscribe to this blog. One man’s garbage is another’s treasure, or entertainment, I guess. People — even smart thoughtful ones — actually LIKE the mix of links, random thoughts, and bits of daily life. They LIKE watching the person, not the topic. I know I do. I find Twitterers who stick to posts about their one professional interest boring. Other people love them, and more power to them. I don’t. IMHO, that’s what blogs are for. If you come to Twitter looking for ideas about a topic, you’re better off watching Twitter trends and searching keywords than following individuals; Twitter usually offers great topical coverage only in the aggregate.
3) Looking at a Twitter feed or profile isn’t the same as following someone on Twitter. People who don’t actually use Twitter think that you have to read all the tweets that are directed specifically @someoneelse.  If you follow from within a Twitter account, there’s a setting so you don’t have to watch that banter unless it’s between people you also follow. That changes the signal/noise ratio  a lot. Yes, there will still be tweets you don’t care about, but let’s be honest, can you name a single blogger who posts only posts you find interesting? I sure can’t.
4) Twitter is about banter. That banter is the best part. I’ve written this blog for a few years and I’ve talked to lots of bloggers. Getting people to post comments is hard. Getting conversation going is harder. The majority of things I write here get no response at all. On Twitter I don’t get responses to everything I say, but I sure get a lot more fast feedback than I do here. It’s also a lot easier to make a quick response to someone else — much more so than commenting on a blog post, especially if, like me, you read your blogs through an RSS reader. That back and forth makes me want to keep participating in Twitter. In comparison, blogging feels like a solitary endevour.
5) Twitter is temporal and cumulative. I made this mistake myself; it’s not until some time after you’ve decided to take Twitter seriously and made it part of the ritual of daily life that you really get it. If you check out someone’s feed, you can get a sense of whether they’re interesting to you, but it’s not until you live with someone’s tweets day in and day out that you know whether the rhythms and content of their messages are going to be rewarding or not. It’s not like a blog where you can read all the archives and get pretty much the full effect. On Twitter, it’s what happens interactively amongst the twitterers over the long haul in real time that makes it interesting.
6) Twitter is a great site for language play. The 140 character limit is a fun challenge for wordsmiths, and those who do it well are joys to read. As a genre, insamuch as it is a genre, the language of Twitter is just way more fun than the language of blogs.
7) Ugh. Can we just quit judging every new mode of communication that comes along and finding it wanting in comparison to the last one? Haven’t we been doing that for millenia? Don’t we always look back later and feel kind of silly?
Don’t like Twitter? Don’t use it! Disappointed someone’s blogging less? Encourage them to keep on blogging by letting them know how much you appreciate the volunteer work they do through blogging. But don’t be disappointed because people don’t twitter how you want them to blog. That just doesn’t make sense.

Labels: , ,